Self-compatibility and pollinator-mediated selection on the floral display in a population of Psychotria carthagenensis (Rubiaceae)

Authors

  • Analia Benavídez Instituto de Ecología, Fundación Miguel Lillo
  • Mariano Ordano Instituto de Ecología, Fundación Miguel Lillo-CONICET
  • Mariana Valoy Instituto de Ecología, Fundación Miguel Lillo

Keywords:

Pollination, reproductive biology, natural selection.

Abstract

Benavidez, Analía; Mariano Ordano; Mariana Valoy. 2013. “Self-compatibility and pollinator-mediated selection on the floral display in a population of Psychotria carthagenensis (Rubiaceae)”. Lilloa 50 (1). The reproductive system of Psychotria carthagenensis varies among populations. Studies carried out in Brazil indicate that this species shows floral polymorphism with a heterostylic system, and is self-compatible. In this work, we studied a population of Yungas in the Tucumán province, Argentina. Our goals were (1) to determine if plants produce fruits by spontaneous autogamy, (2) to evaluate the role of pollinators in fruit production and as selection agents on floral display. The individuals of the studied population are self-compatible and apparently monomorphic. In 23 plants, the proportion of fruits produced by spontaneous autogamy (inflorescences closed to pollinators) varied between 0,06 and 0,74 (¢ = 0,36; s.d. = 0,17). In open inflorescences of the same plants, the proportion of produced fruits varied between 0,23 and 0,92 (¢ = 0,56; s.d. = 0,22), and differed significantly from spontaneous autogamy. This suggests that pollinators play an important role in fruit production. Selection analyses indicate that the number of inflorescences (?ii = 0,379; s.e. = 0,091; p < 0,001) and the number of flower per inflorescence might be targets of pollinator-mediated selection (?ii = 0,515; s.e. = 0,091; p < 0,001). Altogether, the self-compatibility and the role of pollinators suggest that P. carthagenensis keeps a mixed reproductive system. It is discussed if this condition might be associated with pollinator mediated and frugivore-mediated selection on floral and fruit display, in relation with the reproductive assurance hypothesis linked to self-fecundation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aizen, M. A. & L. D. Harder. 2007. Expanding the limits of the pollen-limitation concept: effects of pollen quantity and quality. Ecology 88: 271-281.

Alonso, C.; C. M. Herrera & T.-L. Ashman. 2012. A piece of the puzzle: a method for comparing pollination quality and quantity across multiple species and reproductive events. New Phytologist 193: 532-542.

Anderson I. A. & J. W. Busch. 2006. Relaxed pollinator-mediated selection weakens floral integration in self-compatible taxa of Leavenworthia (Brassicaceae). American Journal of Botany 93: 860-867.

Barrett, S. C. H. 2003. Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 358: 991-1004.

Benavídez, A. 2011. El despliegue de frutos de Psychotria carthagenensis (Rubiaceae) y su papel en la interacción con vertebrados dispersores, en la sierra de San Javier, Tucumán, Argentina. Tesis de Licenciatura. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán.

Benitez-Vieyra S.; A. M. Medina; E. Glinos & A. A. Cocucci. 2006. Pollinator-mediated selection on floral traits and size of floral display in Cyclopogon elatus, a sweat bee-pollinated orchid. Functional Ecology 20: 948-957.

Blendinger, P. G. & M. Villegas. 2011. Crop size is more important than neighborhood fruit availability for fruit removal of Eugenia uniflora (Myrtaceae) by bird seed dispersers. Plant Ecology 212: 889-899.

Brodie III, E. D.; A. J. Moore & F. J. Janzen. 1995. Visualizing and quantifying natural selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10: 313-318.

Busch, J. W. & L. F. Delph. 2012. The relative importance of reproductive assurance and automatic selection as hypotheses for the evolution of self-fertilization. Annals of Botany 109: 553-562.

Cabrera, A. L. 1976. Regiones fitogeográficas argentinas. Enciclopedia de Agricultura, Jardinería y Fruticultura. ACME, Buenos Aires, 85 pp.

Castro, C. & A. C. Araujo. 2004. Distyly and sequential pollinators of Psychotria nuda (Rubiaceae) in the Atlantic rain forest, Brazil. Plant Systematics and Evolution 244: 131-139.

Castro, C. C., P. E. A. M. Oliveira & M. C. Alves. 2004. Breeding system and floral morphometry of distylous Psychotria L. species in the Atlantic rain forest, SE Brazil. Plant Biology 6: 755-760.

Consolaro, H. N.; S. C. S. Silva & P. E. Oliveira. 2011. Breakdown of distyly and pin-monomorphism in Psychotria carthagenensis Jacq. (Rubiaceae). Plant Species Biology 26: 24-32.

Contreras, P. S. & J. F. Ornelas. 1999. Reproductive conflicts of Palicourea padifolia (Rubiaceae) a distylous shrub of a tropical cloud forest in Mexico. Plant Systematics and Evolution 219: 225-241.

Cresswell, J. E. 1998. Stabilizing selection and the structural variability of flowers within species. Annals of Botany 81: 463-473.

Faria, R. R.; L. Navarro; V. Ferrero & A. C. Araujo. 2012. Flexible mating system in distylous populations of Psychotria carthagenensis Jacq. (Rubiaceae) in Brazilian Cerrado. Plant Systematics and Evolution 298: 619-627.

Ferrer, M. M. & S. V. Good. 2012. Self-sterility in flowering plants: preventing self-fertilization increases family diversification rates. Annals of Botany 110: 535-553.

Goodwillie, C.; S. Kalisz & C. G. Eckert. 2005. The evolutionary enigma of mixed mating systems in plants: occurrence, theoretical explanations, and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 47-79.

Hamilton, C. W. 1985. Architecture in Neotropical Psychotria L. (Rubiaceae): dynamics of branching and its taxonomic significance. American Journal of Botany 72: 1081-1088.

Hamilton, C. W. 1989. A revision of mesoamerican Psychotria Subgenus Psychotria (Rubiaceae), Part I: introduction and species 1-16. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 76: 67-111.

Harder L. D. & S. C. H. Barrett. 1995. Mating costs of large floral displays in hermaphrodite plants. Nature 373: 512-515.

Harder, L. D. & S. C. H. Barrett. 1996. Pollen dispersal and mating patterns in animal-pollinated plants. In: D. G. Lloyd & S. C. H. Barrett (editors). Floral biology. Studies on floral evolution in animalpollinated plants. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 140-190.

Harder, L. D. & M. A. Aizen. 2010. Floral adaptation and diversification under pollen limitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 365: 529-543.

Harder, L. D. & S. D. Johnson. 2009. Darwin’s beautiful contrivances: evolutionary and functional evidence for floral adaptation. New Phytologist 183: 530-545.

Hernández-Ramírez, A. M. 2012. Distyly, floral visitors, and fructification in 2 natural populations of Psychotria nervosa (Rubiaceae). Ecoscience 19: 133-139.

Igić B. & J. R. Kohn. 2006. The distribution of plant mating systems: study bias against obligately outcrossing species. Evolution 60: 1098-1103.

Igić B. & J. W. Busch. 2013. Is self-fertilization an evolutionary dead end? New Phytologist 198: 386-397.

Jordano, P. 1995. Frugivore-mediated selection on fruit and seed size: birds and St. Lucie’s cherry, Prunus mahaleb. Ecology 76: 2627-2639.

Kearns, C. A. & D. W. Inouye. 1993. Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, 583 pp.

Klinkhamer, P. G. L.; T. J. de Jong & L. A. Linnebank. 2001. Small-scale spatial patterns determine ecological relationships: an experimental example using nectar production rates. Ecology Letters 4: 559-567.

Knight, T. M.; J. A. Steets; J. C. Vamosi; S. J. Mazer; M. Burd; D. R. Campbell; M. R. Dudash; M. O. Johnston; R. J. Mitchell & T.-L. Ashman. 2005. Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 467-497.

Koch, A. K.; P. Campos da Silva & C. A. Silva. 2010. Biologia reprodutiva de Psychotria carthagenensis (Rubiaceae), espécie distílica de fragmento florestal de mata ciliar, Centro-Oeste do Brasil. Rodriguésia 61:551-558.

Lamelas, C. M.; J. D. Forciniti & L. Soulé Gómez. 2011. El tiempo y los cultivos en el periodo julio – septiembre 2010. Avance Agroindustrial 32:42-47.

Lande, R. & S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.

Medel, R. & J. Nattero. 2009. Selección mediada por polinizadores sobre el fenotipo floral: examinando causas y blancos de selección natural. En: R. Medel, M. A. Aizen & R. Zamora (editores). Ecología y evolución de interacciones planta-animal. Editorial Universitaria, S.A., Santiago, pp. 77-94.

Moegenburg, S. M. & D. J. Levey. 2003. Do frugivores respond to fruit harvest? An experimental study of short term responses. Ecology 84: 2600-2612.

Ohashi, K. & T. Yahara. 2002. Visit larger displays but probe proportionally fewer flowers: counterintuitive behaviour of nectar-collecting bumble bees achieves an ideal free distribution. Functional Ecology 16:492-503.

Ordano, M.; J. Fornoni; K. Boege & C. Domínguez. 2008. The adaptive value of phenotypic floral integration. New Phytologist 179: 1183-1192.

Ordano, M.; K. Aguilar Tejada & A. Benavídez. 2011. Caracterización de la variación intra-individual en tamaño y forma del fruto en Psychotria carthagenensis Jacq. (Rubiaceae). Lilloa 48: 189–204.

Pacheco, S. & H. R. Grau. 1997. Fenología de un arbusto del sotobosque y ornitocoria en relación a claros en una selva subtropical de montaña del noroeste de Argentina. Ecología Austral 7: 35-41.

Pellmyr, O. 2002. Pollination by animals. In: C. M. Herrera & O. Pellmyr (editors). Plant-animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp. 157-184.

R Development Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org/

Raduski, A. R.; E. B. Haney & B. Igić. 2012. The expression of self-incompatibility in Angiosperms is bimodal. Evolution 66: 1275-1283.

Real, L. (Editor). 1983. Pollination biology. Academic Press, Orlando, 338 pp.

Richards, A. J. 1986. Plant breeding systems. Allen and Unwin, London, 544 p.

Sakai, S. & S. J. Wright. 2008. Reproductive ecology of 21 coexisting Psychotria species (Rubiaceae): when is heterostyly lost? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 93: 125-134.

Sicard, A. & M. Lenhard. 2011. The selfing syndrome: a model for studying the genetic and evolutionary basis of morphological adaptation in plants. Annals of Botany 107: 1433-1443.

Sobrevila, C., N. Ramírez & N. Xena de Enrech. 1983. Reproductive Biology of Palicourea fendleri and P. petiolaris (Rubiaceae), heterostylous shrubs of a tropical cloud forest in Venezuela. Biotropica 15: 161-169.

Valoy, M.; M. Ordano & A. Benavidez. 2012. Herbivoría foliar y autonomía de ramas en Psychotria carthagenensis Jacq. (Rubiaceae). Lilloa 49: 000-000.

Virillo, C. B.; F. N. Ramos; C. C. de Castro & J. Semir. 2007. Floral biology and breeding system of Psychotria tenuinervis Muell. Arg. (Rubiaceae) in the Atlantic rain forest, SE Brazil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 21: 879-884.

Wilcock, C. & R. Neiland. 2002. Pollination failure in plants: why it happens and when it matters. Trends in Plant Science 7: 270-277.

Winn, A. A.; E. Elle; S. Kalisz; P.-O. Cheptou; C. G. Eckert; C. Goodwillie; M. O. Johnston; D. A. Moeller; R. H. Ree; R. D. Sargent, & M. Vallejo-Marín. 2011. Analysis of inbreeding depression in mixed-mating plants provides evidence for selective interference and stable mixed mating. Evolution 65: 3339-3359.

Published

2013-06-07

How to Cite

Benavídez, A., Ordano, M., & Valoy, M. (2013). Self-compatibility and pollinator-mediated selection on the floral display in a population of Psychotria carthagenensis (Rubiaceae). Lilloa, 50(1), 10–19. Retrieved from https://www.lillo.org.ar/journals/index.php/lilloa/article/view/383
صندلی اداری سرور مجازی ایران Decentralized Exchange

Issue

Section

Original papers
فروشگاه اینترنتی صندلی اداری جوراب افزایش قد ژل افزایش قد خرید vpn خرید vpn سرور مجازی بایننس