Proposal of Behavioral Categorization System in CD1 Strain Mice

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30550/j.azl/1914

Keywords:

Categorization, conduct, mice CD1

Abstract

Behavior is a concept that has been tried to be understood since ancient times, its evolution has gone hand in hand with natural sciences, biology, comparative psychology among other disciplines. Psychology is not limited only to the behavioral study of human beings; thus, non-human animal species have been an important part of the study of behavior within this discipline. Animal experimentation has contributed to the understanding of the relationship between the behavioral patterns of different living organisms. This research shows the methodological and theoretical foundations for the development of a system of behavioral categorization with mice of the CD1 strain. An explanatory-observational type of research is used, along with a nomothetical, multidimensional design, which includes a follow up process that applies behavioral records. For the analysis, four independent observers were used, with them it was possible to estimate the "Kappa de Cohen" coefficient, and with the "Chi-Square" test of statistical, independence was estimated.  The results show that the system of behavioral categorization was constructed based on 5 general categories, which are made up of specific behaviors. It is evident from the behavioral records that these are behaviors performed by the biological units of analysis throughout the research days. In turn, the concordance analysis shows that the four observers used coincide almost perfectly with the system created. The significances obtained determine that there is a relationship between the categorization system and the independent observations, thus confirming the hypothesis generated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aimone, M. (1992). Institute of laboratory animal resources: ILAR, Organization of the United Nations. https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US19920077591

Anguera, M., Blanco, A., Hernández, A., y Losada, J. (2011). Diseños Observacionales: ajuste y aplicación en Psicología del deporte. Cuadernos de Psicología del Deporte, 11, 63-76. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234794537.pdf

Aponte-Zumba, J. A., Martínez-Suárez, P. C., Reiván-Ortiz, G. G., y Ramírez-Coronel, A. A. (2022). Observational validation of Juan Enrique Azcoaga’s pedagogical learning theory with CD1 mice.

Ardila, R. (1986). Significado y Necesidad de la Psicología Comparada. Revista latinoamericana de psicología, 18, 157-169. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/805/80518202.pdf

Baker, H. J. (1987). The CD-1 mouse: A versatile and widely used laboratory animal. Laboratory Animals, 21(4), 347-353.

Benjumea, S., y Zentall, T. (2006). Darwin lives: Introduction to the Serie on Animal Learning and Cognition. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 6,129-132. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/560/56060201.pdf

Bustos, M., y Terán, V. (2018). La Ley Orgánica de Bienestar Animal (LOBA) en Ecuador análisis jurídico. Derecho Animal, 9, 108-126. https://revistes.uab.cat/da/article/view/v9-n3-hernandez-fuentes

Carreño-Salinas, T., Martínez-Suarez, P., Reivan-Ortiz, G., y Maxi-Maxi, E. (2022). Validación de la teoría del aprendizaje de Juan Enrique Azcoaga con ratones CD-1 mediante observación directa: Aprendizaje fisiológico. Revista Cientifica de la Facultade de Veterinaria, 32.

Casarrubea, M., Sorbea, F. y Crescimanno, G. (2009). Structure of rat behavior in hole-board: I) multivariate analysis of response to anxiety, Physiology & Behavior, 96, 174-179. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0031938408003089#!

Campos-Ordoñez, T., y Buriticá, J. (2024). Evaluación de las cepas endogámicas de ratón C57BL/6 y CD1 endogámicas utilizando un programa de proporción progresiva durante el desarrollo. Fisiología y Comportamiento, 114485.

Darwin, C. (1859). The Origin of Species. Appleton and Company. http://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/pdf/1861_OriginNY_F382.pdf

Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Library of Congress. https://www.loc.gov/resource/rbctos.2017gen33382v1/?sp=2&r=0.042,-0.025,0.959,0.691,0

Darwin, C. (1872). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Library of Congress. https://pure.mpg.de/rest/items/item_2309885/component/file_2309884/content

Crabbe, M. J., Wang, G. Q., y Metzger, E. (2001). Genetics of mouse behavioral phenotypes. Trends in Neurosciences, 24, 32-36.

Fernández, E. (1997). Structure of the mouse behaviour on the elevated plus-maze test of anxiety. Behav Brain Res, 86, 105-12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9105588/

Froján, M., Montaño, M., Calero, A., García, A., Garzón, A. y Ruiz, E. Sistema de categorización de la conducta verbal del terapeuta. Psicothema, 20, 603-609. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28231006_Sistema_de_categorizacion_de_la_conducta_verbal_del_terapeuta

Gagliano, M., Vyazovskiy, V., Borbély, A., Grimonprez, M., y Depczynski, M. (2016). Learning by Association in Plants. Scientific Reports, 6, 1-9. https://www.nature.com/articles/srep38427

García, S. (2020). Descartes y el pensamiento animal: acciones exteriores vs. acciones interiores. Revista Internacional de Filosofía, 79, 161-176. https://revistas.um.es/daimon/article/view/315391

Guillen, J. (2005). Federation of European laboratory animal science associations (FELASA). The Quality Assurance Journal, Wiley Online Library, 9, 147-148. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/qaj.324

Kupfer, D., First, M., y Regier, D. (Eds.). (2008). A research agenda for DSM V. American Psychiatric Pub. https://contextualscience.org/system/files/Kupfer,2002.pdf

Landis, J. y Koch, G. (1977). The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. JSTOR, 33, 159-174. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2529310?read-now=1&refreqid=excelsior%3Ad73a6656905d9aa1d0aaf76edff9f5d6&seq=1

López, C. (2009). Inteligencia animal en Aristóteles. Discusiones Filosóficas, 10, 69-81. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0124-61272009000200005#pag15b

Martínez, P., Herrera, A., Parra, N., Aristizábal, J. y Arístides, P. (2020). Una Historia de las Ciencias de la Conducta. Centro de Estudios Sociales de América Latina. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N8RFPhcv1EttYV7DMm2yCRvkl_MsOfj1/view

Mendivelso, F., y Rodríguez, M. (2018). Prueba Chi-Cuadrado de Independencia aplicada a tablas 2xN. Revista Médica Sanitas, 21, 92-95. https://www.unisanitas.edu.co/Revista/67/05Rev_Medica_Sanitas_21-2_FMendivelso_et_al.pdf

Metzger, M. (2015). Knowledge of the animal welfare act and animal welfare regulations influences attitudes toward animal research. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science,54, 70-75. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311745/

Morgan, C. (1890). Animal life and intelligence. Stanfoord University Library. https://archive.org/details/animallifeandin00morggoog/page/n13/mode/2up

Orozco, I., Santoyo, Velasco, C. y Méndez, G. (2017) Análisis Observacional de Patrones Conductuales: Una Perspectiva “Más allá” de La Operante, Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 43, 40-59. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/593/59353305003.pdf

Pavlov, I. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex. Annals of Nurosciences, 17. 136-141. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4116985/pdf/ANS1017-0309-17-136.pdf

Reivan, G. (2020). Rat in Box Program: Experimental Analysis of Animal Behavior. Research and Analysis journal, 3, 211-221. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwiQ84OH59_uAhUhRjABHe-QA6cQFjAAegQIAxAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Frajournals.com%2Findex.php%2Fraj%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F130%2F51%2F307&usg=AOvVaw3VFChOZiBp-RUAbbAQHjgl

Romanes, J. (1882). Animal Intelligence. International Scientipic Series. https://archive.org/details/animalintelligen00romauoft/page/n7/mode/2up

Romero, W., Batista, Z., Lucca, M., Ruano, A., García, M., Rivera, M., García, J., y Sánchez, S. (2016). El 1, 2, 3 de la experimentación con animales de laboratorio. Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica, 33, 288-299. http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-46342016000200015

Sigrist, H., Hogg, D. E., Senn, A., y Pryce, C. R. (2024). Modelo de ratón de aversión pavloviana excesiva inducida por estrés social crónico Memoria de aprendizaje. Protocolos Actuales, 4.

Skinner, B. (1974). About Behaviorism. Vintage. https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/168146/about-behaviorism-by-b-f-skinner/

Tannenbaum, J., y Bennett, B. (2015). Russell and Burch’s 3Rs then and now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 54, 120-132. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4382615/

Thorndike (1911). Animal Intelligence Experimental Studies. The Macmillan Company. https://archive.org/details/animalintelligen00thor/page/n5/mode/2up

Watson, J. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 158-177. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1926-03227-001

Propuesta de un Sistema de Categorización Conductual en ratones de la Cepa CD1

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Maxi Maxi, E. A., Martínez-Suárez, P. C., Reivan-Ortiz, G. G., Viñanzaca López, J. P., Bravo Corral, G. E., & Valencia Serpa, P. del R. (2024). Proposal of Behavioral Categorization System in CD1 Strain Mice. Acta Zoológica Lilloana, 199–217. https://doi.org/10.30550/j.azl/1914
صندلی اداری سرور مجازی ایران Decentralized Exchange

Issue

Section

Articles
فروشگاه اینترنتی صندلی اداری جوراب افزایش قد ژل افزایش قد خرید vpn خرید vpn سرور مجازی بایننس