Different staining techniques evaluation for the study of sperm morphology and morphometry in bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera)

Ana Sofía Dip; Eduardo Martín; Marcela Beatriz Hernández; María Daniela  Miotti

doi:10.30550/j.azl/1891

Authors

Ana Sofía Dip CONICET NOA Sur (Centro Científico Tecnológico – Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), Tucumán, Argentina https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0276-0704
Eduardo Martín Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9000-191X
Marcela Beatriz Hernández Instituto de Fisiología Animal, Fundación Miguel Lillo https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1279-1937
María Daniela Miotti Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0862-9861

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30550/j.azl/1891

Keywords:

Spermatozoa, Staining and Labeling, Histocytological Preparation Techniques, Microscopy

Abstract

The study of sperm morphology involves the use of various staining techniques that allow visualization of different structures of the spermatozoon and their variabili-
ty. Each technique varies depending on the dyes used and the necessary steps for execution. The aim of this work was to evaluate different staining techniques for sperm morphology and morphometry analysis in bats. Samples were collected from the epididymis of 57 adult specimens, which were macerated in Farmer’s solution and used to prepare smears. The smears were stained with Toluidine Blue, Giemsus (n=4), Molossops temminckii (n=2), Histiotus laephotis (n=1), and Myotis albescens (n=1). Among the evaluated techniques, Toluidine Blue proved to be a quick, simple, and cost-effective method in order to determine the presence of spermatozoa and describe their general morphology. Dicromatic stains like Hematoxylin-Eosin and
May Grünwald-Giemsa were more efficient in differentiating the nucleus and acrosome, although they were also more complex and costly to perform. In conclusion, we recommend the use of the aforementioned three techniques as optimal choices for initial studies of sperm morphology in bats.
sa, May Grünwald-Giemsa, Gram stain, Hematoxylin-Eosin, DAPI (4’,6-diamid-
ino-2-phenylindole), Basic Fuchsin, and Janus Green. Criteria for comparing the
techniques were complexity, time required, and associated costs., Microphotographs
were taken using light and epifluorescence microscopy for morphometric analysis,
and 50 spermatozoa were measured per individual. Spermatozoa were obtained from
16 specimens: Artibeus planirostris (n=5), Sturnira erythromos (n=3), Molossus molos-

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aksoy, E., Aktan, T. M., Duman, S., Cuce, G. (2012). Assessment of Spermatozoa Morphology under Light Microscopy with Different Histologic Stains and Comparison of Morphometric Measurements. International Journal of Morphology, 30, 1544-1550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022012000400045

Álvarez-Guerrero, A., Medrano, A., Moreno-Mendoza, N. (2014). Characterization of gametes in two phyllostomid bat species: Artibeus jamaicensis and Sturnira lilium. Animal Reproduction Science, 145, 170-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.01.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.01.015

Ariagno, J., Mormandi, E. (2016). Guía práctica para la evaluación del semen. Bioquímica y Patología Clínica, 80, 29-36.

Bancroft, J. D., Gamble, M. (2008). Theory and practice of histological techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences.

Barth, A. D., Oko, R. J. (1989). Abnormal morphology of bovine spermatozoa. Iowa State University Press.

Beguelini, M. R., Puga, C. C., Taboga, S. R., Morielle-Versute, E. (2011). Ultrastructure of spermatogenesis in the white-lined broad-nosed bat, Platyrrhinus lineatus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Micron, 42, 586-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2011.02.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2011.02.004

Beguelini, M. R., Taboga, S. R., Morielle-Versute, E. (2012). Ultrastructural characteristics of spermatogenesis in Pallas’s mastiff bat, Molossus molossus (Chiroptera: Molossidae). Microscopy research and technique, 75, 856-868. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.22005

Beguelini, M. R., Taboga, S. R., Morielle-Versute, E. (2017). Ultraestructure of Spermatogenesis and Sperm Bats. In Reproductive Biology, Physiology and Biochemistry of Male Bats (1-19). Frontiers in Reproductive Science. Ciudad de México, México. https://doi.org/10.2174/9781681085548117010004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/9781681085548117010004

Belletti, M. E., Mello, M. L. (2004). Comparisons between the toluidine blue stain and the feulgen reaction for evaluation of rabbit sperm chromatin condensation and their relationship with sperm morphology. Theriogenology, 62, 398-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.10.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2003.10.016

Beletti, M. E., da Fontoura Costa, L., Guardieiro, M. M. (2005). Morphometric features and chromatin condensation abnormalities evaluated by toluidine blue staining in bull spermatozoa. Journal of Morphological Sciences, 22, 85-90.

Bueno, L. M., Beguelini, M. R., Comelis, M. T., Taboga, S. R., Morielle-Versute, E. (2014). Ultrastructure of spermatogenesis, spermatozoon and processes of testicular regression and recrudescence in Eptesicus furinalis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Animal Reproduction Science, 148, 228-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.05.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.05.018

Ding, X., Leigh, C. M., Goodman, S. M., Bedford, J. M., Carleton, M. D., Breed, W. G. (2010). Sperm morphology in the Malagasy rodents (Muroidea: Nesomyinae). Journal of Morphology, 271, 1493-1500. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10889

Di Rienzo, J. A., Casanoves, F., Balzarini, M. G., González, L., Tablada, M., Robledo, C. W. (2008). InfoStat, versión 2008, Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.

Fasel, N. J., Helfenstein, F., Buff, S., Richner, H. (2014). Electroejaculation and semen buffer evaluation in the microbat Carollia perspicillata. Theriogenology 83, 904-910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.11.030 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.11.030

Forman, G. L., Genoways, H. H. (1979). Sperm morphology. In Biology of bats of the New World family Phyllostomatidae (177-204). Texas: Special publications the Museum Texas Tech University.

Forman, G. L., Smith, J. D., Hood, C. S. (1989). Exceptional size and unusual morphology of spermatozoa in Noctilio albiventris (Noctilionidae). Journal of Mammalogy, 70, 179-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1381684

García-Herreros, M., Aparicio, I. M., Barón, F. J., García-Marín, L. J., Gil, M. C. (2006). Standardization of sample preparation, staining and sampling methods for automated sperm head morphometry analysis of boar spermatozoa. International Journal Andrology, 29, 553-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2006.00696.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2006.00696.x

Gómez, G. L. (2011). Efecto de las gotas citoplásmicas sobre la capacidad fecundante del espermatozoide en el cerdo. Tesis de doctorado en Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.

Hirth, H. F. (1960). The spermatozoa of some North American bats and rodents. Journal of Morphology, 106, 77-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051060103

Meschede, D., Keck, C. Zander, M., Cooper, T. G., Yeung, C. H, Nieschlag, E. (1993). Influence of three different preparation techniques on the results of human sperm morphology analysis. International Journal of Andrology, 16, 362-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.1993.tb01363.x

McManus, J. F. A., Mowry, R. W. (1968). Técnica Histológica. Atika SA, Madrid.

Morais, D. B., de Paula, T. A. R., de Freitas, K. M., da Matta, S. L. P. (2012). Cycle of the seminiferous epithelium of the bat Molossus molossus, characterized by tubular morphology and acrosomal development. Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction, 1, 303-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2305-0500(13)60097-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2305-0500(13)60097-4

Mortimer, D., Menkveld, R. (2001). Sperm morphology assessment - historical perspectives and current opinions. Journal of Andrology, 22, 192-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1939-4640.2001.tb02171.x

Nieto Dionisio, K. D. (2010). Técnicas de reproducción asistida. Tinciones para la evaluación de la morfología espermática. Universidad Simón Bolivar, Sartenejas, Caracas, Venezuela.

Soler, C., Gadea, B., Soler, A. J., Fernández-Santos, M. R., Esteso, M. C., Núñez, J., Moreira, P. N., Núñez, M., Gutierrez, R., Sancho, M., Garde, J. J. (2005). Comparison of three different staining methods for the assessment of epididymal red deer sperm morphometry by computerized analysis with ISAS®. Theriogenology, 64, 1236-1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.02.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.02.018

Solís, G. O. (1996). Hematología: técnicas y procedimientos de laboratorio. Mediterráneo. Santiago de Chile.

Thitipramote, N., Suwanjarat, J., Leigh, C., Breed, W. G. (2011). Variation in sperm morphology of a murine rodent from South-East Asia: The Greater Bandicoot Rat, Bandicota indica. Acta Zoologica, 92, 201-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.2010.00453.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.2010.00453.x

Toro-Montoya, A. I. (2009). Espermograma. Medicina y Laboratorio, 15, 145-169

Underwood, W., Anthony, R. (2020). AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2020 edition. Retrieved on March, 2013:2020-1. https://www.spandidos-publications.com/var/AVMA_euthanasia_guidelines_2020.pdf

Van der Horst, G., Maree, L. (2009). SpermBluew: a new universal stain for human and animal sperm which is also amenable to automated sperm morphology analysis. Biotechnic and Histochemistry, 84, 299-308. https://doi.org/10.3109/10520290902984274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/10520290902984274

Vitullo, A. D., Roldan, E. R. S., Merani, M. S. (1988). On the morphology of spermatozoa of tuco-tucos, Ctenomys (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae): New data and its implications for the evolution of the genus. Journal of Zoology, 215, 675-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1988.tb02403.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1988.tb02403.x

WHO, World Health Organization. (2010). Laboratory manual for the examination and processing of human semen. New York, Cambridge University Press. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/44261/9789750011245_tur.pdf

Xu, Y. H., Jin-Chun, L. Tang, S. S. (2022). Effects of six kinds of sperm staining methods on human sperm size and evaluation of their staining effects. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, 36, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24794

Yániz, J. L., Soler, C., Santolaria, P. (2015). Computer assisted sperm morphometry in mammals: a review. Animal Reproduction Science, 156, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.03.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.03.002